In a previous post I summarized statistics showing that online dating is not only prevalent, but also slightly more successful than offline dating in producing stable (i.e., less likely to result in divorce) and satisfying long-term romantic partnerships. There is no definitive research on this question, but we can certainly engage in some informed speculations.
Below, I will present a list of possibilities, and look forward to your thoughts and feedback! Dating companies such as EHarmony and Ok Cupid argue that their proprietary compatibility algorithms enable users to sift through undesirable matches and identify the suitable ones.
- Free adult webcam pics
- wqho is cheryl miller dating
- dating affiliate site
- Live free sex chatting no credit card is needed
- I want site for free internationa sex chat
- Devilsfuck date with no signing up
However, scientific research does not support it, at least when it comes to personality compatibility.
That is, there is no evidence that extroverts are best matched with introverts, or people who are open to experience prefer others who are also open to experience.
One notable finding is that individuals high in neuroticism (i.e., the personality trait that denotes whether someone tends to experience negative and easily changeable emotions—think Woody Allen’s characters) tend to form the least stable and satisfying unions.
When it comes to values, attitudes, and beliefs, research supports the notion that long-term couples tend to be more similar with each other than random strangers.
That is, individuals typically encounter relatively small numbers of potential partners from whom they can choose.
Further, the diversity of these partners is limited, with, say, teachers meeting other teachers, students from a small town meeting others just like them, etc.
This issue is compounded for those looking for love later in life, when their social circles tend to be made predominantly of other couples.
This is known as the similarity hypothesis, or the “birds of a feather flock together" effect.
However, this similarity was not shown to contribute to relationship satisfaction.
This being said, to rigorously test dating companies’ claims, the scientific community would need access to their exact compatibility algorithms, which we currently do not have. As discussed in my previous post, traditional dating is based on physical proximity, with individuals choosing partners with whom they intersect frequently in everyday life, such as at work or school.
This offline pool of partners is by definition restrictive.